|
Maurice Ling's
Professional Portfolio - Research Portfolio Returns on Grants: Benchmark of R&D Output |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the citation for Barbara McClintock's Nobel Prize, Professor Ringertz of Karolinska Institute said the following to Dr. McClintock, "your
work is encouraging because it shows that great discoveries can still be
made with simple tools." I am a proponent of good stewardship of R&D
grants as a large part of it are public funds. As an academic, I will
want my students to leave me with a strong concept that R&D dollars is a
privilege. However, there is no real measure and benchmark of R&D
output. Hence, I am adapting the concept of "Returns on Equity" and
"Returns on Investment" to measure my own efficiency in using
grants, naming it
"Returns on Grants" or ROG. Grants comprises of the total amount of money I am given for research and development activities. ROG will then be the quotient of grants less allowable deductions (accessible grant) and the number of manuscripts produced. The allowable deductions are:
Number of manuscripts equivalents are computed as follow: Each peer-reviewed manuscript is considered as one manuscript. Each book (monograph or collection) is 0.6 manuscript. Each book chapter (both peer-reviewed and un-reviewed) is 0.3 manuscript. Each technical report, R&D-based un-reviewed manuscript, abstract, poster and talk is 0.1 manuscript. Hence, my Return on Grants is calculated to be $1767 per manuscript equivalent. Details are as follows:
Number of manuscripts equivalents = 15.1
|